FDA: if BPA does not belong to Baby Bottles, why does it belong to Food Packaging?

Studies have linked BPA to everything from increased risks of certain cancers, to diabetes, reproductive abnormalities, infertility, heart disease…

FDA Finally Decides That BPA Doesn’t Belong In Baby Bottles… it was announced that baby bottles and sippy cups can no longer contain BPA. ”

Even though the FDA proudly declared that “Consumers can be confident that these products do not contain BPA,” it then adds, “The agency continues to support the safety of BPA for use in products that hold food.”  So the FDA is saying we should feel confident it banned the use of a chemical it doesn’t actually believe is dangerous?

Read FDA Finally Decides That BPA Doesn’t Belong In Baby Bottles, consumerist, July 17, 2012.

Author: DES Daughter

Activist, blogger and social media addict committed to shedding light on a global health scandal and dedicated to raise DES awareness.

6 thoughts on “FDA: if BPA does not belong to Baby Bottles, why does it belong to Food Packaging?”

  1. Nice catch, you’re on todays issue of The Daily Exposure. Thanks for reporting on this underappreciated issue, and the dichotomy of the response from FDA.
    Adam

Have your say! Share your views

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: